On May 17, 2013, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Washington issued an Order in the case of In re Huber, which was the subject of my article, Domestic Asset Protection Trust Blows Up Bigger Than Alaska In Huber Case. The Huber decision, which applied Washington state law to a Domestic Asset Protection Trust (DAPT) formed in Alaska, where the settlor/beneficiary was resident in Washington state, called into very serious question the viability of DAPTs both in bankruptcy and f...
Why Dahl Doesn't Support The Viability Of Domestic Asset Protection Trusts
Forbes - 10 Jul 2013 21:16
On May 17, 2013, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Washington issued an Order in the case of In re Huber, which was the subject of my article, Domestic Asset Protection Trust Blows Up Bigger Than Alaska In Huber Case. The Huber decision, which applied Washington state law to a Domestic Asset Protection Trust (DAPT) formed in Alaska, where the settlor/beneficiary was resident in Washington state, called into very serious question the viability of DAPTs both in bankruptcy and f...
Share this Article
Recommended