Why would anyone want to read the original manuscript of a young writer who subsequently wrote a world-renowned classic, except to trace the development of that writer? Why, upon reading it, would anyone ascribe meaning to that manuscript so as to diminish, question or require a re-thinking of the writer's fabulously successful published work? That first manuscript served as a waystation on a young writer's journey to produce her novel, nothing else. It merits no consideration in and of itself. ...
Why would anyone want to read the original manuscript of a young writer who subsequently wrote a world-renowned classic, except to trace the development of that writer? Why, upon reading it, would anyone ascribe meaning to that manuscript so as to diminish, question or require a re-thinking of the writer's fabulously successful published work? That first manuscript served as a waystation on a young writer's journey to produce her novel, nothing else. It merits no consideration in and of itself. ...
Share this Article
Recommended