Open source investigation by Atlantic Council of where bombs fell found most attacks to be outside Isis-controlled territory Russian claims to have mostly bombed Islamic State targets during its Syrian campaign were wildly out of step with reality, according to a report using aerial surveillance, crowdsourcing and other open source techniques. The report says the almost six months of Russian airstrikes up until the 27 February ceasefire caused only peripheral damage to Isis.
Russian claims on Syria airstrikes 'inaccurate on grand scale', says report
The Guardian - 5 Apr 2016 15:36
Open source investigation by Atlantic Council of where bombs fell found most attacks to be outside Isis-controlled territory Russian claims to have mostly bombed Islamic State targets during its Syrian campaign were wildly out of step with reality, according to a report using aerial surveillance, crowdsourcing and other open source techniques. The report says the almost six months of Russian airstrikes up until the 27 February ceasefire caused only peripheral damage to Isis.
Share this Article
Recommended